From the “Patent of Toleration” of
Emperor Joseph II (1781)
Convinced on the one hand by the harmfulness of all coercion
of conscience and on the other hand of the great benefit for
religion and the state of a true Christian toleration, we have
found ourselves persuaded to allow adherers to the Augsburg and
Helvetian confessions to perform a religious practice appropriate
to their religion….The Roman-Catholic religion alone should
continue to have precedence in regard to public religious practices.
1. … Concerning the churches, we expressly enjoin,
where it is not already so, that there should be no bell ringing,
no bells, no towers and no public entrance from the street…
7. Non-Catholics are permitted real estate and property, rights
of citizenship and craftsmanship, academic titles and civil employment…and
they are to be urged to no other oath than to that which is appropriate
to their religious principles, nor to the attendance of the processions
or functions of the dominant religion…
***
Questions for further work
1. What understanding of toleration can be seen in this Patent
of Toleration? Is it identical with today’s understanding
of toleration or can it be distinguished from this?

2. Why are the Protestant churches (Augsburgian = Lutheran, according
to the Augsburg Confession of 1530; Helvetian = Reformed, according
to the Second Helvetian Confession of 1566) entitled both existence
and church services, but nevertheless only a limited public space?

3. Are there distinctions between the Catholics and Protestants
in respect to their rights of citizenship?
|